The United States District Court D in Colorado addressed that question in Rivera v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., Civil Action No. 16-cv-00227-MSK-MJW, (D. Colo.,…
In Bavlsik v. General Motors, Nos. 16-1491, 16-1632, (8th Cir. 2017), the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit took on this question. About five…
In Tucker v. Government Employees Insurance Company, No. 14-1192 (10th Cir. 2017), the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit untangled this disagreement.…
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit looked at that question in Hiltner v. Owners Insurance Company, No. 16-3217 (8th Cir. 2017).…
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit answers that question in Peterson v. Travelers Indemnity Company, No. 16-1146 (8th Cir. 2017). Lori…
What Evidence Proves an Insurance Company Has Satisfied Its Statutory Duty of Proper Notice When Canceling a Policy?
Because of the lack of proof that the cancellation notices were timely sent by certified mail, American Standard did not meet its burden.
Does UM/UIM Statute Require Each Named Insured to Reject the Coverage or Is One Rejection Binding for All?
The Supreme Court also examined whether the Colorado legislature, in writing that statute, negated the common law principles of implied authority and apparent authority.
Ashour’s claim for UIM benefits under his policy with AFI is not barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Act, or by the “legally entitled to recover” language of the policy.
The Court of Appeals looked at whether the district court abused its discretion in excluding so many medical bills.
Ultimately, the court determines the untimely disclosure was harmless and therefore, Baldwin will not be excluded.
- Home & Family